Friday, 17 June 2011

Villain Study - Omega



Omega is a much vaunted villain in the Who fandom. More than just a rogue Time Lord, he is one of the key figures in Time Lord history and no less than one of the Doctor's personal heroes. Alongisde the morally ambiguous Rassilon, he was one of the founders of Time Lord society, yet his instrumental role in discovering time travel resulted in him being marooned in an anti-matter dimension without any hope of return. Naturally, this has left him rather ill-disposed towards Time Lords. So is this a complex and interesting character or an overrated man in a bad costume?

Spoilers for the serials The Three Doctors and Arc of Infinity are to follow:

Our first meetings with Omega in the Three Doctors finds Troughton and Pertwee, aided by the Hartnell's steady voice, kidnapped and taken to the anti-matter dimension. Therein they confront the man himself, and Pertwee's Doctor tries to go toe-to-toe with him in a, well, contest of wills. Demonstrated by the Dr fighting a man dressed up as cat. In the end, however, Omega is proven to be the stronger willed of the two, and the Doctor instead defeats Omega through his cunning.

In this episode Omega gives the Doctor the full Bond villain speech: "I created the Time Lords and they deserted me!" in short. He's a brilliant scientist even for a Time Lord, which are by definition a society of brilliant scientists, but also incredibly vain and prideful. His ridiculous hamminess in this serial is mostly a very entertaining, as he declares that "No one can withstand the will of Omega!". Yes, he refers to himself in first person.

Nonetheless, we do have something of a complex figure here. Omega's sympathetic streak comes from the fact that he has genuinely been wronged. Not necessarily out of malice on the side of the Time Lords, but from the fact that he was deemed to have essentially sacrificed himself. So whilst his wrath is misplaced, it also feels very much understandable. He’s been stuck in this anti-matter dimension for a long time with no one but his own constructs to keep him sane.

The most striking scene from the episode is undoubtedly the one where he removes his helmet to reveal...nothing. As a physical entity, Omega no longer exists. It is a clever twist on the episode’s incredibly lazy narrative mechanics, and the revelation that his will is the only thing left of him is indeed striking. This scene, however, is undercut by the scene chewing that had been entertaining up until that point. Due to the scene’s dramatic power, the reaction feels like it’s spoiling something genuinely good.

Omega emerges from the Three Doctors well, sympathetic and villainous and a lot of fun. In the Arc of Infinity he remains rather less intensely as the focus: he plays the part of the shadowy conspirator pulling the strings. For much of the serial his identity is a large part of the mystery. It is only during the climax that he steps out and we get a closer look at him.

It is rather a different character that we end up seeing too. Omega’s characterisation comes right at the end, where he reveals that he wishes to travel back to our universe in order to “Find peace”. He is a pitiable, Gollum-esque creature and the power balance has been very much reversed, as the Doctor is every bit the more competent of the two. It’s not a revenge driven fanatic this time, but a desperate and exhausted outcast seeking a return home. In The Three Doctors, Omega was basically a god, able to manipulate reality with a thought; quite the contrast.

As opposed as these two characters are – and they might as well be separate characters – I don’t think that it would be impossible to reconcile them into one person. Rather, I’d love to see such a thing happen, portraying a villain who is both indomitable and weak. It has great potential to amount to one of the great Who enemies, but as it stands we have two very contrasting portrayals with no real connection beyond plot ones.

In neither of the serials does Omega really do anything that marks him out as the genius he is meant to be. The Three Doctors has him just magic things out of thin air because he “willed it”. It’s never explained, and is incredibly lazy. Most of his acclaim comes from the Doctor talking about how great he is, and as ever telling is nowhere near as convincing as showing. The Arc of Infinity has him involved in a pretty standard plot, wherein someone in the Time Lord high council is working for him. He doesn’t do much of the work here, and relies upon his man in the council who ends up doing what he does with pretty thin motivation. Whilst he certainly makes an impression, in neither cases does he strike me as a truly great enemy.

I like Omega. He has a fantastic concept behind him and although he is inconsistently portrayed, there was a full decade between each of the serials, so it’s to be expected and forgivable to an extent. It would be nice to see some of the concepts behind him executed better, some plots that demonstrate what makes him a Time Lord legend and a fusion of both of his portrayals to represent a duality in his nature, further emphasising his tragic nature.

Monday, 13 June 2011

Film Review - X-Men: First Class

tl;dr: It's very good. Gripping plot, great direction, mostly very strong acting, brilliantly affecting characters and outstanding treatment of themes. Go see it before I run out of superlatives.

***



Firstly, allow me to state my biases: I don't like the X-Men. Sure, the animated show when I was young was great, but the movies came around and put me off of them. The first was hardly the worst superhero action movie ever, but it's weak characterisation, bad dialogue and general mediocrity failed to endear me to it. The way it slobbered over Wolverine too, like a fan girl's gushing, annoyed me. If you like Wolverine then you'll be more inclined to treat it favourably. I don't like Wolverine, at least not as he comes across in the films.

Admittedly, the first is probably the strongest of the trilogy. To criticise the other two would be to regurgitate my feelings towards the first movie, as it is pretty much the same faults that dragged them down for me, too. I didn't even bother seeing the Wolverine origins movie, and popular concensus speaks well of this decision. So when another X-Men prequel was announced, naturally I was rather less than excited. Then the reviews started pouring in, and suddenly expectations were raised. Could this be as good as I was hearing, good enough to sit along the top echelons of comic book cinema?

X-Men: First Class starts off on a bleak note. In a scene straight from the first film Magneto is seperated from his parents during the holocaust, only to try and rip the metal fence around the camp down. A man spots him, a man impressed by the display of magnetic power, and summons him to try and repeat the effect. When the child is unable to, he summons Magneto's mother and threatens her. Seeing the child flailing impotently with his great power is a very stark way to start the film, but it never sets the tone so much as provide a strong under pinning to Magneto's motives in the film.

By contrast we see the posh and priviliged Xavier confronting an intruder in his own kitchen. It is quickly revealed that the child already has considerable control over his powers and is an intelligent and competent youngster. He is also compassionate, and it is a very complete young man that we see before our eyes. Soon enough, however, we see him emerging into adulthood, and it is clear that something has been lost. He uses his intellect to impress girls and spends his time drinking.

Our third protagonist, a female CIA agent who exists mainly to drive the plot forward, is then seen sneaking her way into a meeting of mob leaders, shadowing an important military figure. Therein she witnesses our antagonists: a gang of mutants playing an international game with massive stakes. Considering that the plot itself is the least compelling part of the movie is not a criticism of the plot itself: it's a fun superhero movie with more than a touch of James Bond style espionage. An international thriller that is married to the thematic ideas and character growth adeptly. More than anything else, it feels like the events of the plot really do matter and this leads to an exciting and suspenseful experience.

Really, what drives this film is the love that the protagonists have for each other as their underlying ideological differences tear them apart. Many of the highlights of the proceedings occur as Xavier and Magneto get to know each other, and find themselves to be personally and intellectually very well matched. This film is a massive tangle with four character arcs as well as the international conspiracy thriller element, and as such the way that development happens succintly yet with an organicness that lends weight to the development. Mystique and Beast, too, get a prominent role, and whilst their respective character arcs don't have the dramatic impact that Magneto and Xavier's do they certainly add value to the proceedings.

It's in the thematic conversations that take place between the characters, each one representing different ideas within the subject, that sets this movie apart as above the cut. It's especially remarkable for just how balanced a look at the ideas are given. There is no "right" side here, and throughout the film you're never quite sure which side is right, nor as to which of the two leads really is the hero. Whilst Magneto is certainly overly aggressive and too rigid in his approach, Xavier is likewise too goody-goody and unwilling to act. As you watch you'll find yourself symathising with both side.

Really, it won't become clear just how great a movie this is until we reach the finale. Herein the inherent tragedy of the story suddenly becomes clear, and the aura of inevitability that surrounds the events only serves to further strengthen the events. It is also remarkable, in that we know how this story is going to end, yet it still throws some surprising twists at us. When everything comes together, it does so beautifully.

The way that character growth, plot developments and thematic concerns develop in tandem with each other is a joy to watch. If there had not been such a strong interlinking then the film would likely have fallen apart, overburdened by plotlines and silliness, but it is overall a well crafted story. Maybe even a match for The Dark Knight? Well, I intend to compare the two directly soon.

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

Review Archive

Here's a contents list of all of my review, all spoiler free unless otherwise stated.. Hopefully, should make things easier to navigate:

Novels -
Films -
Television -
Comics -
Short Stories -

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Steven Moffat doesn't mince his words


Ah, Moff's amusingly harsh words on Dr Who of olden days. As someone who isn't really an old Who fan, I have to say, he is very bloody harsh. Yet for some reason I only find this amusing. Good ol' Moff.

Friday, 3 June 2011

Television Review – The Arc of Infinity



Ah, the Doctor Who of old. As someone who comes from this lively little island of Britain, Doctor Who has been something of a cultural staple for me. As a youngster my exposure to the old Dr Who was short – I stopped watching the reruns, unable to take the horrible production values seriously. Now, as something of a massive dr Who fanboy, I’ve decided to go back and give the old series another look.

The Arc of Infinity is a story from Peter Davidson’s run as the Fifth Doctor, and probably by all accounts my least favourite. Whilst Davidson certainly brings sensibilities that make his Doctor a distinct and worthy one to the Who mythos, I can’t get away from the fact that he’s a bit boring. He’s noble and sober, stern at times but also softly spoken. Not without humour, but certainly lacking much of what makes your Bakers and McCoys and Smiths so damn entertaining.

And this week, on Celebrity Wife Swap
Arc of Infinity sees him and his companion, Nyssa, targeted by a villain from an anti-matter universe. The villain’s identity is not revealed until the latter part of the story, which is odd since every blurb I find of the episode has the villain’s name plastered all over it. When this shady figures tries to connect with the Doctor, in order to bring himself into our universe, the Time Lords get understandably knotty about the whole thing. Their plan? Kill the Doctor. This does present a compelling grey morale choice for the characters: is such action worth taking in order to save the universe from getting a hole punched in it? The problem here is that it feels contrived that the Time Lords would decide so quickly to murder a man they all – well, almost all - admit to be innocent.

The titular Arc of Infinity, too, is poorly established. It’s handwaved aside with a few moments of vague technobabble and then used as a central macguffin to drive the plot forward. Lazy writing, really, but not something I am unfamiliar with as a fan of Dr Who. Aside from this point, however, the story is very enjoyable. Mainly it serves as a kind of mystery, as to which of the Time Lord High Council are the traitors, and despite one twist that promises interesting things, the eventual conclusion can be seen coming a mile off. Despitebeing predictable, the mystery element still very much entertaining and there are a few characters that serve to make interesting.
 
On the whole, the characterisation is good. Certainly, our evil villain is given a very sympathetic angle when the inevitable villainous breakdown occurs, and the Castellan of the High Council is another who stands out. This is pretty standard Dr Who fare all round, but there is a sense that this isn’t a story with clear cut bad guys or good guy. More towards the end when questions are being answered.

Production values are terrible, but that enjoyably terrible old Dr Who style.  Really, if you don’t find something amusing or charming about them, then you’re not going to be watching old Dr Who. Really, if you’ve watched old style Dr Who you know the drill by now. This is a decent serial, with good characterisation and a decent pace despite its five episode length. There’s little here to mark it as a great, but nonetheless enjoyable.

Thursday, 2 June 2011

Power Rangers Marathon, and other stuffs

So, I sat through a Power Rangers marathon the other day. Yes, I know.

But anyhow, it was a disappointing 21 hours, as I ended up sleeping through a couple of episodes. And when you've sat through fifty of the bastards, just missing the entire series by two is damn disheartening. Nonetheless, it was an intense quasi-delirious experience that cemented Bulk and Skull’s theme tune in my head for most likely the rest of my life. Not the worst soundtrack to live to, is it?



But beyond that, Dr Who has now officially knocked my socks off then strangled me with them. Every question that is answered opens up a couple more, and I figure that this one to be patient with. From the Moff’s blistering opener, to Gaiman’s introspective look at the Dr Who mythos, and then the most recent character based cloning exercise with an ending that hits like a baseball bat. So far, five out of six episodes have been at a ridiculous standard.

Working on a Who fic. atm. Kinda making it up as I go along. I’ll give it a proof read once I’m finished, then I’ll share it with ya.

So yeah, be scared.